Compare
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.
Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.
A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.
Focus by buyer type
| Brand | Nap Tea Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Amorino Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Jamba Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitals | |||
Investment range | $624K – $777K | $439K – $981K | $481K – $941K |
Liquid capital | $30K – $60K | $65K – $125K | $15K – $43K |
Franchise fee | $300K | $30K | $36K |
Royalty rate | 4.0% | N/A | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | N/A | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Performance | |||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $1.1M | $675K |
Median gross sales | N/A | $970K | $625K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | $128K | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | P&L Bottom Line | Not classified |
| Risk | |||
Rating | FWeakest tier | CAverage | AStrongest tier |
Verdict score | 26 / 100 | 46 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% | 3.6% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 9 | 28 |
| Scale | |||
Total units | 0 | 22 | 710 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | N/A | 4.5% | 6.5% |
| Contract | |||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 | 20 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 5 | 20 |
Initial training (hrs) | 80 | 60 | 105 |
| Contacts | |||
Franchisee phones | 2 | 11 | 100 |
Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →