Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Fortune Practice Management logoAStrongest tier
Fortune Practice Management
Healthcare
Remove
Auxo Medical logoCAverage
Auxo Medical
Healthcare
Remove
MedXwaste logoAStrongest tier
MedXwaste
Healthcare
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$36K – $175K
$100K – $138K
$102K – $142K
Liquid capital
$15K – $20K
$14K – $17K
$25K – $40K
Franchise fee
$13K
$50K
$50K
Royalty rate
12.0%
8.0%
N/A
Ad fund rate
0.6%
2.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
N/A
N/A
N/A
Median gross sales
N/A
N/A
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
N/A
N/A
Earnings metric
Not classified
P&L Bottom Line
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
CAverage
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
65 / 100
43 / 100
59 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
66.7%
N/A
N/A
SBA loans on record
3
N/A
N/A
Scale
Total units
68
4
9
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
3
10
7
Renewal term (years)
3
5
7
Initial training (hrs)
52
80
36
Contacts
Franchisee phones
30
0
8

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →