Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (Clinic Net Operating Income, assumed annual). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand
100% Chiropractic logoAStrongest tier
100% Chiropractic
Healthcare
 Remove
Success On The Spectrum logoAStrongest tier
Success On The Spectrum
Healthcare
 Remove
medspa810 logoFWeakest tier
medspa810
Healthcare
 Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$340K – $898K
$321K – $848K
$476K – $868K
Liquid capital
$30K – $120K
$30K – $60K
$60K – $90K
Franchise fee
$51K
$45K
$60K
Royalty rate
6.5%
5.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
N/A
N/A
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$780K
N/A
N/A
Median gross sales
$700K
N/A
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
$150K
N/A
N/A
Earnings metric
Clinic Net Operating Income
assumed annual
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
AStrongest tier
FWeakest tier
Verdict score
71 / 100
73 / 100
14 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SBA loans on record
39
63
8
Scale
Total units
117
52
3
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
1.8%
0.0%
66.7%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
5
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
182
80
64
Contacts
Franchisee phones
97
84
6

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →