Trapped vs CycleBar
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Trapped and CycleBar are recreation & entertainment franchises. Trapped requires an investment of $538K – $958K while CycleBar requires $411K – $1.1M. CycleBar discloses average revenue of $424K; Trapped makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. CycleBar has SBA lending data on file with a 11.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Trapped F (Weakest tier) and CycleBar C (Average).
| Metric | Trapped | CycleBar |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | FWeakest tier | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $538K – $958K | $411K – $1.1M |
| Franchise Fee | $35K | $60K |
| Royalty Rate | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | $424K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 11.0% (143 loans) |
| Total Units | 0 | 189 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +0 units | -27 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2025 | 2015 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$538K – $958K
$411K – $1.1M
Franchise Fee
$35K
$60K
Royalty Rate
7.5%
7.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
$424K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
11.0% (143 loans)
Total Units
0
189
Unit Growth (YoY)
+0 units
-27 units
Year Began Franchising
2025
2015
FDD Year
2025
2025