Retrofitness vs BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Retrofitness and BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK are health & fitness franchises. Retrofitness requires an investment of $2.0M – $3.2M while BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK requires $2.5M – $4.6M. In terms of revenue, BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK reports higher average unit revenue at $2.7M. On SBA loan performance, BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK has a lower charge-off rate (0.0%) compared to Retrofitness (7.0%). FranchiseVerdict rates Retrofitness B (Above average) and BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Retrofitness | BIG AIR TRAMPOLINE PARK |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove averageAbove average | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $2.0M – $3.2M | $2.5M – $4.6M |
| Franchise Fee | $29K | $50K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $1.2M | $2.7M |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 7.0% (128 loans) | 0.0% (22 loans) |
| Total Units | 77 | 17 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2008 | 2015 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$2.0M – $3.2M
$2.5M – $4.6M
Franchise Fee
$29K
$50K
Royalty Rate
5.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$1.2M
$2.7M
SBA Charge-Off Rate
7.0% (128 loans)
0.0% (22 loans)
Total Units
77
17
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2008
2015
FDD Year
2026
2025