Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Merle Norman Cosmetics vs FOOT SOLUTIONS

Franchise Comparison 2026

Both Merle Norman Cosmetics and FOOT SOLUTIONS are retail franchises. Merle Norman Cosmetics requires an investment of $48K – $263K while FOOT SOLUTIONS requires $131K – $189K. FOOT SOLUTIONS discloses average revenue of $507K; no Item 19 revenue figure is on file for Merle Norman Cosmetics. Note: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. On SBA loan performance, Merle Norman Cosmetics has a lower charge-off rate (20.0%) compared to FOOT SOLUTIONS (32.1%). FranchiseVerdict rates Merle Norman Cosmetics D (Below average) and FOOT SOLUTIONS D (Below average).

Investment Range
$48K – $263K
$131K – $189K
Franchise Fee
N/A
$40K
Royalty Rate
No royalty is charged. Franchisee's ongoing payments to MNC arise instead from wholesale purchases of MN Products/supplies and small fixed technology/marketing service fees (POS support $300/yr, Social Media $144/yr, Email Marketing $336/yr, SMS $168/yr, Microsite hosting $180/yr + $100/yr content).
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
$507K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
20.0% (158 loans)
32.1% (95 loans)
Total Units
757
46
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
1934
2000
FDD Year
N/A
2023