CycleBar vs Trapped
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both CycleBar and Trapped are recreation & entertainment franchises. CycleBar requires an investment of $411K – $1.1M while Trapped requires $538K – $958K. CycleBar discloses average revenue of $424K; Trapped makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. CycleBar has SBA lending data on file with a 11.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates CycleBar C (Average) and Trapped F (Weakest tier).
| Metric | CycleBar | Trapped |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | CAverage | FWeakest tier |
| Investment Range | $411K – $1.1M | $538K – $958K |
| Franchise Fee | $60K | $35K |
| Royalty Rate | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $424K | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 11.0% (143 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 189 | 0 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | -27 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2015 | 2025 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$411K – $1.1M
$538K – $958K
Franchise Fee
$60K
$35K
Royalty Rate
7.0%
7.5%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$424K
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
11.0% (143 loans)
N/A
Total Units
189
0
Unit Growth (YoY)
-27 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2015
2025
FDD Year
2025
2025