Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Ume Tea Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Red’s Savoy Pizza Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $161K – $427K | $78K – $508K |
Liquid capital | $30K – $50K | $5K – $25K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 4.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 3.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $770K |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | DBelow Average |
Risk score | 47 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 50.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 15 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 13 | 17 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 7 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 7 |
Initial training (hrs) | 73 | 116 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 1 | 29 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Ume Tea vs Red’s Savoy Pizza editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →