Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Schlotzsky’s Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Tapville Social Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $648K – $2.0M | $101K – $2.5M |
Liquid capital | $39K – $71K | $3K – $100K |
Franchise fee | $36K | $45K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 4.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $1.1M | $385K |
Median gross sales | $1.1M | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 56 / 100 | 34 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 20.6% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 533 | 8 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 308 | 36 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 20 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 20 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 250 | 155 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 94 | 36 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Schlotzsky’s vs Tapville Social editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →