Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Schlotzsky’s logo

Schlotzsky’s Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsGAFranchising since 2017
BAbove averageAbove average51/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$658K – $934K
Disclosed sales
$1.1M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
20.6%
on 533 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02245FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Schlotzsky's is a fast-casual franchise known for its toasted sourdough-bun sandwiches, plus pizzas, salads, and soups. Franchisees run restaurants managing food prep, counter service, and staffing.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Schlotzsky’s franchise requires a total initial investment of $658K – $934K, including a $36K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.1M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 20.6% charge-off rate across 533 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$658K – $934K
84th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Net sales22nd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
308
86th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
20.6%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$658K – $934K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$36K – $36K
Median $35K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$39K – $51K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.1M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
20.6%
533 loans · Median 14.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
308 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
6.2%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $658K – $934K including a $36K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $1.1M).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 51/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 20.6% across 533 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -15 franchised outlets in the latest year (4 opened, 19 closed); 64 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • DECLINESystem contracting at -6.4% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Schlotzsky's Franchisor SPV LLC
Parent company
GoTo Foods Systems LLC
FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
GoTo Foods LLC (formerly Focus Brands LLC)
FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Schlotzsky's Franchise LLC (SFL)
Prior franchisor entity
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
5620 Glenridge Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30342
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$308.9M
vs $299.2M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 10

6 other brands on this site name GoTo Foods LLC (formerly Focus Brands LLC) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
James (Jim) E. Holthouser
Headquarters
GA
Founded
1971
FDD year
2025
States available
25

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 64% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$658K – $934KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 43 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$35,500Verified — printed on page 28 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$39K – $51K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown25 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$36K$36K
Construction and Build Out Costs$288K$360K
Permitting$2K$11K
Equipment Package$134K$153K
Millwork$20K$22K
Furniture$3K$7K
Menu Board, Graphics and Interior Signage$7K$8K
Exterior Signage$15K$19K
Computer System$23K$27K
Smallwares$7K$8K
TV/Music$0$3K
Architect/Engineer$5K$30K
Rent$3K$8K
Grand Opening Marketing$15K$25K
Legal and Accounting Fees$3K$12K
Insurance$2K$9K
Misc. Opening Costs/Office Supplies$500$5K
Security Deposits$7K$10K
Management Training Program Fee$0$10K
Travel and Living Expenses during Training$10K$40K
Total initial investment$658K$934K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$658K – $934K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$39K – $51K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$36K – $36K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
4.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Schlotzsky’s: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund4.0% of net sales
Technology fee$230
Transfer fee$18K
Renewal fee$7K
Inventory (initial)$8K – $25K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 16% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.1M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 89 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 89 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeAverage Net Sales by Quart…
Sample size204 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Schlotzsky’s until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$841K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Schlotzsky’s unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,126,331 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $658K–$934K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $39K–$51K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$841K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.1M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Average Net Sales by Quartile for Traditional Franchises, split by drive-thru vs. non-drive-thru, Fiscal Year 2024
Sample size
204 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$397K→$2.8MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 88 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$674K→$1.7M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank22th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank84th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank86th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank48th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 158 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.1M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -6.4% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Schlotzsky’s Compares

Metric
Schlotzsky’s
Category median
vs median
Investment
$796K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.1M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
308
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units308Verified — printed on page 91 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-6.4% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate6.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
308
Opened
4
Last reporting year
Closed
19
Terminated
12
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
6.2%
Company-owned
28
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
91%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-6.4%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-6.4%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
12
Not renewed
1
Reacquired
6
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
64
0.21 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
6
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
13.6%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
4.2%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
6.2%
Units that stopped operating
2022
299
Franchised units
2023
295-4
Franchised units
2024
280-15
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 24 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 24 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

402 current owners across 37 states.

  • TE 181
  • AR 32
  • OK 23
  • MI 16
  • AL 13
  • GE 12
  • CO 10
  • GA 10
  • KA 10
  • KS 10
  • NE 10
  • AZ 8
  • +25 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 19 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 20.6% charge-off
Total loans
533
Loan volume
$217.0M
Median loan
$407K
average
Charge-off rate
20.6%
on 533 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
N/A
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
103
Defaults
89
Typical loan rate
6.4%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
N/A
Jobs supported
2,232
Lender concentration
N/A

Borrower mix: 47% went to startups / new businesses, 53% to established operators

Top lenders financing Schlotzsky’s franchisees

BancFirstN/A loans—
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationN/A loans—
United Community BankN/A loans—

Showing 3 of 103 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
12
Loan volume
$7.7M
Charge-off rate
0.0%
Jobs created
155

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Schlotzsky’s from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Avg interest rate
6.39%
Avg chargeoff amount
$284K
Jobs supported
2,232

Top SBA lenders

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1BancFirst7N/AN/A
2JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association7N/AN/A
3United Community Bank4N/AN/A
4Community National Bank & Trust3N/AN/A
5Cadence Bank3N/AN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas250--
OKOklahoma90--
SCSouth Carolina50--
ALAlabama30--
KSKansas30--
LALouisiana30--
FLFlorida20--
ILIllinois20--
NMNew Mexico20--
WIWisconsin20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2009
1
2013
3
2014
11
2015
5
2016
7
2017
3
2018
5
2019
4
2020
3
2021
10
2022
2
2023
3
2024
4
2025
1
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup11 (37%)
Ownership change8 (27%)
Existing (2+ yr)6 (20%)
New (< 2 yr)3 (10%)
Unanswered2 (7%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 20.6% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 5 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 20.6% — 29% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off20.6% · 533 loans
Verdict score51/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average51Verdict score 51/100

Parent-level (GoTo Foods) financials strong: net worth $285.6M, net income $254M. One old franchisee suit settled for $250,000 in 2016; other disclosures are affiliate regulatory settlements. 308 units, audited, Item 19 disclosed, but -6.4% contraction. Judged on operations.

High confidence±4 pts
4755

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

FYA Project, LLC and Fernando Lara-Celis v. Schlotzsky's entities and employees. Claims: tortious interference with prospective business relationship, tortious interference with existing contract, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, deceptive conduct under Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. Original demand: $3 million plus multiple damages, exemplary/punitive damages and attorneys' fees. Case referred to binding arbitration on August 28, 2014. Settled on March 8, 2016.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $308.9MYr 2: $299.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financial statements are of GoTo Foods Systems LLC and Subsidiaries (parent/guarantor), consolidated across the GoTo Foods Portfolio franchise systems, not Schlotzsky's alone

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 51 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROne settled 2016 franchisee suit ($250K) plus affiliate settlements
  2. 02MINORParent-level financials strong ($285.6M net worth)
  3. 03MED-6.4% unit contraction; audited, Item 19 disclosed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 158 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term20 yrs
Renewal term20 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training250 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term20 years
Renewal term20 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹRadius
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ1 year
Non-compete (miles)ℹ3 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ12
Curable defaultsℹ10
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMetropolitan area of district court where franchisor's principal place of business is located (currently Georgia)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawGeorgia
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

FYA Project, LLC and Fernando Lara-Celis v. Schlotzsky's entities and employees. Claims: tortious interference with prospective business relationship, tortious interference with existing contract, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, deceptive conduct under Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. Original demand: $3 million plus multiple damages, exemplary/punitive damages and attorneys' fees. Case referred to binding arbitration on August 28, 2014. Settled on March 8, 2016.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
50 hrs
On-the-job training
200 hrs
Training location
On-site at Restaurant
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
Franchisee selects, franchisor reviews and accepts based on minimum site criteria
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

421 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 421 contacts · $49
Free preview
(325) 672-••••TE
Unlock all 421 contacts
(469) 281-••••TE
(316) 425-••••KA
(817) 294-••••TE
(601) 707-••••MI

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Schlotzsky’s franchise?

The total investment to open a Schlotzsky’s franchise ranges from $658K – $934K, with an initial franchise fee of $36K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Schlotzsky’s franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Schlotzsky’s FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.1M. The median is $1.1M. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Schlotzsky’s?

Schlotzsky’s is franchised by Schlotzsky's Franchisor SPV LLC. Its parent company is GoTo Foods Systems LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is GoTo Foods LLC (formerly Focus Brands LLC). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Schlotzsky’s FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Schlotzsky’s FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Schlotzsky’s's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Schlotzsky’s has a charge-off rate of 20.6% across 533 loans, meaning 20.6% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Schlotzsky’s franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Schlotzsky’s has 308 total units in the United States, including 280 franchised units and 28 company-owned units. 4 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Schlotzsky’s a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Schlotzsky’s as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 51 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Schlotzsky’s, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.