Schlotzsky’s vs Tapville Social
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Schlotzsky’s and Tapville Social are full-service restaurants franchises. Schlotzsky’s requires an investment of $648K – $2.0M while Tapville Social requires $101K – $2.5M. In terms of revenue, Schlotzsky’s reports higher average unit revenue at $1.1M. Schlotzsky’s has SBA lending data on file with a 20.6% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Schlotzsky’s B (Above Average) and Tapville Social A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | Schlotzsky’s | Tapville Social |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove AverageAbove Average | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $648K – $2.0M | $101K – $2.5M |
| Franchise Fee | $36K | $45K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $1.1M | $385K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 20.6% (533 loans) | Limited data |
| Total Units | 308 | 36 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2017 | 2019 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$648K – $2.0M
$101K – $2.5M
Franchise Fee
$36K
$45K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$1.1M
$385K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
20.6% (533 loans)
Limited data
Total Units
308
36
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2017
2019
FDD Year
2025
2025