Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Rose Tea Lounge™ Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Açai Republic Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $276K – $406K | $178K – $505K |
Liquid capital | $15K – $35K | $38K – $100K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 57 / 100 | 39 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 4 | 29 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 181 | 145 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 3 | 47 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Rose Tea Lounge™ vs Açai Republic editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →