Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (Total Revenue, NET PROFIT (before taxes)). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Hydrate IV Bar logoCAverage
Hydrate IV Bar
Healthcare
Remove
ProMD Health logoBAbove average
ProMD Health
Healthcare
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$242K – $448K
$197K – $511K
Liquid capital
$45K – $75K
$50K – $150K
Franchise fee
$50K
$50K
Royalty rate
8.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$722K
$2.1M
Median gross sales
$612K
$2.1M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
$444K
Earnings metric
Total Revenue
NET PROFIT (before taxes)
Risk
Rating
CAverage
BAbove average
Verdict score
44 / 100
63 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
N/A
N/A
SBA loans on record
7
2
Scale
Total units
17
12
Net change (latest yr)
+4
+3
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
10
Initial training (hrs)
58
120
Contacts
Franchisee phones
10
9

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Hydrate IV Bar vs ProMD Health editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →