Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Blue Martini logoBAbove average
Blue Martini
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Golden Corral logoAStrongest tier
Golden Corral
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$3.4M – $13.0M
$4.9M – $8.5M
Liquid capital
$50K – $100K
$19K – $125K
Franchise fee
$50K
$50K
Royalty rate
5.0%
4.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
2.4%
Performance
Avg gross sales
N/A
$4.9MOutlet subset
Median gross sales
N/A
$4.7MOutlet subset
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
N/A
Earnings metric
Not classified
Operating Income
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
53 / 100
61 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
N/A
12.8%
SBA loans on record
1
225
Scale
Total units
8
348
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
0.0%
1.2%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
15
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
255
263
Contacts
Franchisee phones
3
360

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Blue Martini vs Golden Corral editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →