Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Batteries Plus logoBAbove average
Batteries Plus
Retail
Remove
RobotLAB logoAStrongest tier
RobotLAB
Retail
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$285K – $537K
$279K – $543K
Liquid capital
$51K – $62K
$25K – $75K
Franchise fee
$35K
$55K
Royalty rate
5.0%
7.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$834K
N/A
Median gross sales
$834K
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
$106K
N/A
Earnings metric
EBITDA
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
56 / 100
64 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
15.2%
0.0%
SBA loans on record
208
2
Scale
Total units
734
29
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
4.8%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
85
154
Contacts
Franchisee phones
99
0

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Batteries Plus vs RobotLAB editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →