Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Batteries Plus logo

Batteries Plus Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

RetailWIFranchising since 1996
BAbove averageAbove average56/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$285K – $537K
Disclosed sales
$955K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
15.2%
on 208 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00254FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent100%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Batteries Plus is a retail franchise selling batteries, light bulbs, and related products, plus phone and key-fob repair, to consumers and businesses. Franchisees run stores handling retail sales, commercial accounts, and repair services.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Batteries Plus franchise requires a total initial investment of $285K – $537K, including a $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $955K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 15.2% charge-off rate across 208 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$285K – $537K
32nd pct Retail
Avg gross sales
$955K
Net sales14th pct Retail
Royalty
5.0%
6th pct Retail
Units
734
42nd pct Retail
SBA charge-off
15.2%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$285K – $537K
Median $336K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$45K – $45K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$51K – $62K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$955K
Median $803K
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
6.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
15.2%
208 loans · Median 14.7%
near median
System Size
734 units
Median 61 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.8%
Median 3.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $285K – $537K including a $45K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $955K/year (median $834K), with an estimated 14% cash-on-cash return (based on EBITDA).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 56/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 15.2% across 208 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -3 franchised outlets in the latest year (30 opened, 32 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Batteries Plus, L.L.C.
Parent company
Square Brands International, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Batteries Plus Holding Corporation
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Batteries Plus Holding Corporation
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Manager
Scott K. Williams
CEO experience
5 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
WI
HQ
1325 Walnut Ridge Drive, Hartland, Wisconsin 53029
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$330.7M
vs $283.7M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • that acquires batteries
  • or predecessor

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Scott K. Williams
Headquarters
WI
Founded
1996
FDD year
2026
States available
47

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 22% above the typical retail franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$285K – $537KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 25 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$44,500Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$51K – $62K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown20 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$15K$50K
Travel and Living Expenses during Training$500$3K
New Store Commercial Support -- 3 months$0$3K
Retail Management System$44K$44K
Omni-Channel Access Fee$10K$10K
Miscellaneous Pre-opening Expenses$2K$5K
Insurance Premiums (3 months)$1K$5K
Commercial Hardware Kit$1K$2K
Delivery Vehicle$5K$24K
Additional Funds - 3 months (prior to site acceptance)$11K$17K
New Store Opening Hardware Kit$7K$10K
New Store Marketing Campaign Contribution$5K$7K
Minimum Store Promotion Requirement$20K$20K
Rent – Security Deposit and 3 months’ rent$8K$19K
Leasehold Improvements$13K$131K
Equipment and Fixtures$35K$43K
Signage$6K$17K
Inventory$58K$77K
Miscellaneous Supplies$4K$5K
Additional Funds - 3 months (store build out and opening)$40K$45K
Total initial investment$285K$537K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$285K – $537K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$51K – $62K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$45K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
6.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
7.1 yrs
From FDD / Item 19

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Batteries Plus: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of net sales
Technology fee$509
Transfer fee$22K
Renewal fee$9K
Inventory (initial)$58K – $77K
Total fee load6.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 6.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 19% above the retail norm.

Avg gross sales$955K

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 59 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$834KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 58 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size490 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Batteries Plus until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$467K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

FDD-reported earnings

The FDD reports $106K as EBITDA. This is a disclosed figure, not our estimate — we publish no modelled profit for Batteries Plus.

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Batteries Plus unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $954,716 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $285K–$537K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $51K–$62K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$467K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$955K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$834K
Avg ebitda
$106K
Reported as EBITDA in FDD Item 19
Cash-on-cash
14.1%
Based on EBITDA / investment midpoint

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
490 outlets
vs category median 46 · large
Range (low → high)
$408K→$7.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 55 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$521K→$1.6M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
10 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank14th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank32th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank6th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank42th
vs Retail peers
Risk score rank27th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 278 Retail brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $955K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.3x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% — below the Retail median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 10/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Retail medians

How Batteries Plus Compares

Metric
Batteries Plus
Category median
vs median
Investment
$411K
$336Kmiddle half $198K–$495K · n=128
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$955K
$803Kmiddle half $529K–$1.1M · n=54
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
734
61middle half 14–208 · n=126
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Retail brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units734Verified — printed on page 71 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
Turnover rate4.8% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
734
Opened
30
Last reporting year
Closed
32
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
4.8%
Company-owned
133
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
1
Transferred
46
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Transfer rate
6.4%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Ceased ops
9.0%
Units that stopped operating
2023
606
Franchised units
2024
604-2
Franchised units
2025
601-3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 16 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 16 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Indiana
  • Michigan

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

30 current owners across 16 states.

  • WA 5
  • CA 4
  • AL 2
  • FL 2
  • GA 2
  • IL 2
  • MI 2
  • OH 2
  • TX 2
  • AZ 1
  • CT 1
  • ID 1
  • +4 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 590 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

C
SBA Lending Health
Average SBA lending record · 15.2% charge-off
Total loans
208
Loan volume
$68.6M
Median loan
$245K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
15.2%
on 208 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
86.5%
5-yr charge-off
14.3%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
84
Defaults
19
Typical loan rate
7.2%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
18.7%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
1,086
2.2 per loan
Lender concentration
8%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 63% went to startups / new businesses, 37% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in all other miscellaneous store retailers (except , franchised businesses charge off at 18.7% vs 23.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 19% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Batteries Plus charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Batteries Plus charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 15 vintages from 1994 to 2023. Rates range from 0.0% to 66.7%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%'94'03'08'12'21'23

Top lenders financing Batteries Plus franchisees

The Huntington National Bank10 loans20.0%
Simmons Bank10 loans60.0%
SouthState Bank, National Association10 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 84 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
9
Loan volume
$3.2M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
46

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Batteries Plus from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
1.9%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
7.15%
Avg chargeoff amount
$91K
Lender concentration
7.9%
Job velocity
2.2 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+0.8pp
NAICS benchmark
12.2%
NAICS 453998
Jobs supported
1,086

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 8% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank10$1.6M20.0%
2Simmons Bank10$1.9M60.0%
3SouthState Bank, National Association10$6.6M0.0%
4ConnectOne Bank9$5.8M0.0%
5Wells Fargo Bank National Association5$890K0.0%
6PNC Bank, National Association4$661K0.0%
7Readycap Lending, LLC4$1.1M66.7%
8First Bank of the Lake4$1.5MN/A
9KeyBank National Association3$2.2M0.0%
10Comerica Bank2$297K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas23214.3%
MIMichigan1000.0%
CACalifornia9114.3%
FLFlorida9133.3%
NCNorth Carolina8125.0%
OHOhio400.0%
SDSouth Dakota4250.0%
ALAlabama31100.0%
GAGeorgia300.0%
IAIowa300.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1994
3
1995
1
1996
2
1997
1
1998
3
1999
4
2000
1
2002
1
2003
4
2005
4
2007
3
2008
3
2009
3
2010
4
2011
1
2012
3
2013
7
2018
8
2019
7
2020
3
2021
9
2022
26
2023
10
2024
6
2025
10

Borrower profile

Startup47 (59%)
Ownership change13 (16%)
Existing (2+ yr)12 (15%)
Unanswered4 (5%)
New (< 2 yr)3 (4%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans here charge off near the 16.0% national average.

SBA charge-off15.2% · 208 loans
Verdict score56/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average56Verdict score 56/100

Batteries Plus presents caution-level risk: a declining franchise system with active litigation, unverified financial claims, and margins that may not justify capital deployment for many franchisees.

High confidence±4 pts
5260

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Batteries Plus v. Osmond Industries (FL, filed Aug 2025) - franchisor sued former franchisee for amounts owed. Ashwant Singh v. Batteries Plus (E.D. Cal / arbitration, commenced Dec 2023) - former franchisee alleged breach of contract, CA Franchise Investment Law violation, fraud; settled Sept 2025 with Batteries Plus paying $590,000.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $330.7MYr 2: $283.7MNon-royalty: $62.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 56 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-0.5% YoY) suggests system contraction despite mature brand presence
  2. 02HIGHDual litigation with both franchisor suing franchisees and franchisees suing franchisor indicates relationship friction and potential operational/contractual disputes

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training85 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius3 mi
Territory population150,000
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ15 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ5
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationWisconsin
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawWI
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

Batteries Plus v. Osmond Industries (FL, filed Aug 2025) - franchisor sued former franchisee for amounts owed. Ashwant Singh v. Batteries Plus (E.D. Cal / arbitration, commenced Dec 2023) - former franchisee alleged breach of contract, CA Franchise Investment Law violation, fraud; settled Sept 2025 with Batteries Plus paying $590,000.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
85 hrs
On-the-job training
40 hrs
Training location
Pewaukee, Wisconsin (Batteries Plus Support Offices) and designated Batteries Plus Store
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
168 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee proposes, franchisor evaluates and must consent
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Retail Management System (Back Office Software, ProSource RMS, Omni-Channel Software)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Retail Management System (Back Office Software, ProSource RMS, Omni-Channel Software)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

620 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 620 contacts · $49
Free preview
(520) 889-••••
Unlock all 620 contacts
(918) 252-••••
(507) 282-••••
(210) 496-••••
(410) 928-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Batteries Plus franchise?

The total investment to open a Batteries Plus franchise ranges from $285K – $537K, with an initial franchise fee of $45K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Batteries Plus franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Batteries Plus FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $955K. The median is $834K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Batteries Plus?

Batteries Plus is franchised by Batteries Plus, L.L.C.. Its parent company is Square Brands International, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Batteries Plus Holding Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Batteries Plus FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Batteries Plus FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Batteries Plus's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Batteries Plus has a charge-off rate of 15.2% across 208 loans, meaning 15.2% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Batteries Plus franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Batteries Plus has 734 total units in the United States, including 601 franchised units and 133 company-owned units. 30 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Batteries Plus a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Batteries Plus as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 56 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Batteries Plus, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Retail franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.