Merle Norman Cosmetics vs PELICAN’S SNOBALLS
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Merle Norman Cosmetics and PELICAN’S SNOBALLS are retail franchises. Merle Norman Cosmetics requires an investment of $48K – $263K while PELICAN’S SNOBALLS requires $82K – $231K. PELICAN’S SNOBALLS discloses average revenue of $148K; no Item 19 revenue figure is on file for Merle Norman Cosmetics. On SBA loan performance, PELICAN’S SNOBALLS has a lower charge-off rate (0.0%) compared to Merle Norman Cosmetics (20.0%). FranchiseVerdict rates Merle Norman Cosmetics D (Below average) and PELICAN’S SNOBALLS A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Merle Norman Cosmetics | PELICAN’S SNOBALLS |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | DBelow averageBelow average | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $48K – $263K | $82K – $231K |
| Franchise Fee | N/A | $25K |
| Royalty Rate | No royalty is charged. Franchisee's ongoing payments to MNC arise instead from wholesale purchases of MN Products/supplies and small fixed technology/marketing service fees (POS support $300/yr, Social Media $144/yr, Email Marketing $336/yr, SMS $168/yr, Microsite hosting $180/yr + $100/yr content). | 8.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/A | $148K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 20.0% (158 loans) | 0.0% (11 loans) |
| Total Units | 757 | 202 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 1934 | 2017 |
| FDD Year | N/A | 2024 |
Investment Range
$48K – $263K
$82K – $231K
Franchise Fee
N/A
$25K
Royalty Rate
No royalty is charged. Franchisee's ongoing payments to MNC arise instead from wholesale purchases of MN Products/supplies and small fixed technology/marketing service fees (POS support $300/yr, Social Media $144/yr, Email Marketing $336/yr, SMS $168/yr, Microsite hosting $180/yr + $100/yr content).
8.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
$148K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
20.0% (158 loans)
0.0% (11 loans)
Total Units
757
202
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
1934
2017
FDD Year
N/A
2024