Liquivida vs Vital Care
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Liquivida and Vital Care are healthcare franchises. Liquivida requires an investment of $621K – $1.0M while Vital Care requires $556K – $1.0M. In terms of revenue, Vital Care reports higher average unit revenue at $16.5M. On SBA loan performance, Liquivida has a lower charge-off rate (0.0%) compared to Vital Care (0.0%). FranchiseVerdict rates Liquivida B (Above average) and Vital Care A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Liquivida | Vital Care |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove averageAbove average | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $621K – $1.0M | $556K – $1.0M |
| Franchise Fee | $40K | $60K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | The aggregate of: 19.25% of Gross Revenue (Non-Specialty), 10.25% (Specialty), 3.25% (Select Specialty), 1.75% (Access), 19.25% (other), plus an Increased Royalty Fee of 0-2% if TTM Gross Revenue exceeds $10,000,000. |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $1.1M | $16.5M |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (15 loans) | 0.0% (56 loans) |
| Total Units | 15 | 110 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2020 | 1986 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$621K – $1.0M
$556K – $1.0M
Franchise Fee
$40K
$60K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
The aggregate of: 19.25% of Gross Revenue (Non-Specialty), 10.25% (Specialty), 3.25% (Select Specialty), 1.75% (Access), 19.25% (other), plus an Increased Royalty Fee of 0-2% if TTM Gross Revenue exceeds $10,000,000.
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$1.1M
$16.5M
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (15 loans)
0.0% (56 loans)
Total Units
15
110
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2020
1986
FDD Year
2025
2025