Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Perkins Restaurant and Bakery logo
AStrongest tier61/100FDD 2025

Perkins Restaurant and Bakery: Litigation & Risk

Quick-Service Restaurants · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

4 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4. Bankruptcy disclosed in Item 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
4
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Disclosed
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
61 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
A
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
39
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
6.7%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
N/A
Defaults
2 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$28.0M
Avg loan size
$717K
Participating lenders
7

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
GA
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

4 predecessor (PMC) employment/PAGA cases; Norwalt (wrongful termination + PAGA, settled $26K), Ramirez (PAGA wage deductions, settled $7K), Nourani (PAGA off-clock/overtime, no resolution), Cupp (class/PAGA rest breaks, individual arbitration, no resolution). All relate to predecessor franchisor Perkins & Marie Callender's LLC.

What drove the 61/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-4.4% YoY) indicates system contraction and potential franchisee struggles
  2. 02MINORNo Item 19 (Net Income) disclosure prevents assessment of actual profitability despite $1.99M average revenue
  3. 03HIGHMaterial employment litigation against predecessor franchisor (PMC) involving wage/hour violations and PAGA claims signals potential operational/compliance risks
  4. 04MINORHigh investment range ($579K-$3.58M) with 4% royalty requires substantial revenue to achieve acceptable returns
  5. 05MINOR20-year term is lengthy commitment for declining franchise with unproven current profitability metrics
  6. 06HIGHSuccessor franchisor liability exposure unclear given litigation tied to predecessor operations

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.