FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing
Jomsom Staffing Services litigation history
What Jomsom Staffing Services disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 9
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- $775K
- As stated in Item 3
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- None
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2025
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
All disclosed litigation involves John T. Hewitt (CEO of affiliate Loyalty LLC) and prior Liberty Tax entities; no actions directly against Jomsom Franchise Company. Cases include securities class action, shareholder derivative suits, DOJ compliance action, and individual disputes — all concluded.
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- Going concern status is FALSE — franchisor cannot guarantee ability to continue operations
- Severe litigation history involving founder John Hewitt with allegations of fraud, tortious interference, and securities violations from Liberty Tax Service tenure
- High franchise fee ($100,000) relative to single-unit system and going concern status creates poor risk/reward ratio
- Management credibility severely compromised by founder's documented history of fraudulent practices and litigation
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?