Fitness 19 litigation history

Parent, affiliates, master franchisor and subfranchisor

Concluded (7)

• F19 Franchising, LLC and F-19 Holdings, LLC v. Endo Fitness LL, LLC, et al.

  settled

  F19 Franchising, LLC ('Prior Franchisor') and F-19 Holdings, LLC (plaintiffs) · filed 2023-01-11 · U.S.D.C. Central District of California · 2:23-cv-00185-MEMF-JC

  “… Case No. 2:23-cv-00185-MEMF-JC, U.S.D.C. Central District of California (the “Predecessor Lawsuit,” and together with the Rodgers Lawsuit, the Endo Lawsuit, and the TTAB Proceedings, the “Endo Matters”).”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On June 25, 2024, the parties to the Endo Matters (defined below) entered into a settlement agreement under which, among other things, each of the Endo Matters were dismissed with prejudice;” (page 11)

• Endo Fitness LL, LLC v. F-19 Holdings, LLC and F19 Franchising LLC, et al.; Endo Fitness LL, LLC v. F-19 Holdings, LLC (Opposition Proceeding No. 91283250); Endo Fitness LL, LLC v. F-19 Holdings, LLC (Cancellation Proceeding No. 92081530)

  settled

  F-19 Holdings, LLC and F19 Franchising LLC ('Prior Franchisor') · filed 2022-03-29 · U.S.D.C. Central District of California; USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2:22-cv-03124-MEMF-JC; 91283250; 92081530

  “Endo Fitness LL, LLC v. F-19 Holdings, LLC and F19 Franchising LLC, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-03124-MEMF-JC, U.S.D.C. Central District of California (the “Endo Lawsuit”);”Page 12 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On June 25, 2024, the parties to the Endo Matters (defined below) entered into a settlement agreement under which, among other things, each of the Endo Matters were dismissed with prejudice;” (page 11)

• Robert Rodger, et al. v. F19 Franchising, LLC and F-19 Holdings, LLC, et al.

  settled

  F19 Franchising, LLC ('Prior Franchisor') and F-19 Holdings, LLC · filed 2021-04-28 · Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles · 21STCV16036

  “… Case No. 21STCV16036, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (“Rodgers Lawsuit”).”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On June 25, 2024, the parties to the Endo Matters (defined below) entered into a settlement agreement under which, among other things, each of the Endo Matters were dismissed with prejudice;”

• Dustin Bonnenfant v. F-19 Holdings LLC, Robert Lineberger, Dominick Milat, and Fitness 29 Colombia SAS

  settled

  F-19 Holdings LLC ('Holdings', our affiliate), Robert Lineberger (our CEO) and others · filed 2019-03-08 · District Court of Harris County, Texas · 2019-17574

  “… Case No. 2019-17574, District Court of Harris County, Texas.”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “the parties entered into a settlement agreement under which Defendants agreed to (a) pay Plaintiff $100,000, (b) allow Plaintiff to retain his ownership interest in the Fitness Clubs, and (c) grant Plaintiff 67% of the profit split arising from the operation of the Fitness Clubs.”

• Sky Canyon Plaza, LLC v. Fitness 19 CA 163, LLC, Fitness 19 CA 297, LLC, F-19 Holdings, LLC, Nick Milat, and Does 1-50

  settled

  Brought by a third party · F-19 Holdings, LLC (our affiliate) and Nick Milat, as owners of Prior Franchisor's franchisees · filed 2019-01-18 · Superior Court of California, County of Riverside · MCC 1900084

  “… Case No. MCC 1900084, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside).”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “the parties entered into a settlement under which Defendants agreed to pay Landlord $50,000 in exchange for mutual releases, and the matter was dismissed with prejudice.”

• IPM, LLC v. The Robert & Cori Lineberger Inter Vivos Trust; Robert Lineberger; and Cori Lineberger

  settled

  Robert Lineberger (our CEO), his trust, and F-19 Holdings, LLC (affiliate, added by amended complaint) · filed 2017-12-17 · Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of King · 18-2-02253-3 SEA

  “… Case No. 18-2-02253-3 SEA (Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for the County of King).”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On September 18, 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement under which: (a) Holdings agreed to give IPM an interest-free loan of $250,000, which would be repayable over 40 months;” (page 11)

• Matter with no printed caption

  concluded

  Government or regulatory action · F-19 Holdings, LLC ('Holdings', our affiliate) · filed 2008-04-15 · California Department of Corporations

  “In January 2008, Holdings was notified that the State of California intended to initiate an inquiry into its licensing activities.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “consenting to the issuance of a Desist and Refrain Order, dated April 15, 2008, under which it agreed not to offer or enter into those types of relationships, in the State of California until the offer had been registered or were exempt from registration under the California Franchise Investment Law.”

Officers and directors (individuals, not the company)

Concluded (1)

• Palagio, LLC v. Fitness 19 OK 257, LLC; Life Fitness, Inc.; Dominick (“Nick”) Milat; John Henry; and Robert Lineberger

  settled

  Brought by a third party · Robert Lineberger (our CEO), with Nick Milat and John Henry · United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma · 5:15-cv-464-M

  “… Case No. 5:15-cv-464-M (United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma).”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “the Defendants paid the landlord $150,000, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on March 8, 2016. Concluded Related Matters On June 25, 2024, the parties to the Endo Matters (defined below) entered into a settlement agreement under which, among other things, each of the Endo Matters were dismissed with prejudice;”