Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Checkers / Rally’s logo
BAbove average56/100FDD 2025

Checkers / Rally’s: Litigation & Risk

Quick-Service Restaurants · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate: Review

3 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
3
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
56 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
B
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
94
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
N/A
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
N/A
Defaults
0 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$16.2M
Avg loan size
$854K
Participating lenders
0

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court, limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Not waived
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
FL
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

1 pending matter: Baby Buford (former franchisees' wrongful termination/advertising misappropriation arbitration). 1 concluded matter: Cotter/Dinh consolidated data breach class action settled with vouchers/reimbursements. 1 franchisor-initiated matter: Southern Shoals cross-claim for indemnification against franchisee in loan default case.

What drove the 56/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORUnit count declining 3.6% YoY (761 units) signals system contraction and potential market saturation
  2. 02HIGHMultiple active litigation matters including wrongful termination claims, data breach settlement, and franchisor indemnification disputes indicate operational and legal instability
  3. 03MEDNet income of $154,055 on $1.1M revenue (14% margin) is thin for QSR with 4% royalty obligation, leaving limited buffer for underperformers
  4. 04MINORHigh investment ceiling ($2.1M+) combined with declining unit count creates elevated risk of poor ROI and difficulty exiting
  5. 05MINORAbsence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents independent verification of average revenue/income claims
  6. 06HIGHProtected territory insufficient offset given brand momentum is negative and litigation suggests franchisor-franchisee relationship strain

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.