Franchise Item 19 Explained: Financial Performance Representations

FDD Item 19 is the section of the Franchise Disclosure Document where a franchisor may disclose financial performance data — including revenue, gross profit, EBITDA, or net income for its franchise locations. Item 19 disclosure is voluntary, and only about 60–65% of franchisors choose to include it. When a brand does disclose, the data can reveal what a typical franchisee actually earns. When a brand doesn't, that silence itself is a signal worth investigating.

What FDD Item 19 actually is

The FDD is a legal document that every franchisor must provide to prospective buyers at least 14 days before any money changes hands or any binding agreement is signed. The FTC Franchise Rule requires 23 specific items in every FDD. Item 19, titled "Financial Performance Representations," is the only place where a franchisor can legally make claims about how much money franchisees make.

This is a critical distinction: outside the FDD, franchise salespeople and brokers are not allowed to provide earnings projections. If a franchisor's development team tells you "our average owner makes $200,000 a year" over the phone but that figure doesn't appear in Item 19, that is a federal violation of the FTC Franchise Rule. It is also a red flag about how the brand conducts business.

Why only 60% of brands disclose

The FTC does not require franchisors to fill in Item 19. A franchisor can simply write "We do not make any financial performance representations" and move on. Many brands choose not to disclose for several reasons:

• Liability risk. If the numbers are misleading or not representative, franchisees who underperform can use the Item 19 data as evidence in a lawsuit. Some franchise attorneys advise clients to skip disclosure to minimize legal exposure.
• Unfavorable data. If the average unit performs poorly, disclosing that information makes selling new franchises harder. Brands with weak economics have a strong incentive to stay silent.
• Data collection challenges. Smaller or newer franchisors may lack the systems to consistently collect financial data from franchisees. Without reliable data, they cannot make defensible claims.
• Competitive sensitivity. Some brands worry that disclosing unit-level economics gives competitors useful intelligence about margins, pricing, and cost structure.

The trend is toward more disclosure. In 2008, roughly 40% of brands included an Item 19. By 2024, that figure has risen to about 63%. Prospective franchisees increasingly demand earnings data, and brands that refuse to provide it lose candidates to competitors that do.

What metrics brands typically report

There is no standard format for Item 19. Each franchisor chooses what to disclose and how to present it. The most common metrics include:

McDonald's, for example, discloses average unit revenue of approximately $4.0 million in its Item 19 but does not break down expenses at the unit level. Chick-fil-A reports an average of about $9.3 million in revenue per restaurant. In both cases, the franchisee's actual take-home pay requires estimating expenses separately — which is why franchise owner salary figures often vary widely.

Averages vs. medians: why presentation matters

The single most important thing to understand when reading Item 19 is the difference between an average (mean) and a median. If a franchise system has 100 locations and five of them generate $10 million while the other 95 generate $500,000, the average revenue is $975,000 — nearly double what most franchisees actually earn. The median, by contrast, would be $500,000, which is far more representative of the typical owner's experience.

Many franchisors report only averages because the number looks better. When evaluating Item 19 data, look for:

• Median figures. If the franchisor reports a median, use that as your baseline rather than the average.
• Quartile breakdowns. Some brands show the top 25%, middle 50%, and bottom 25% separately. This is the most transparent format because it shows the full distribution.
• Percentage of units achieving the average. A footnote might say "42% of units exceeded the stated average." If fewer than half beat the average, the data is heavily skewed by top performers.

Red flags in Item 19 disclosures

Even when a franchisor does disclose Item 19 data, the presentation can be misleading. Watch for these warning signs:

1. Revenue only, no expenses. Gross revenue without expense data is almost meaningless for projecting your income. A restaurant doing $1.5M in sales with 95% in expenses is a losing business.
2. Company-owned units mixed in. Some brands combine data from company-owned and franchise-owned locations. Company stores often perform differently because they benefit from corporate resources, prime locations, and no royalty payments.
3. Excluding new or underperforming units. Read the footnotes carefully. If the data only includes locations open more than two years, or if it excludes the bottom 10%, the numbers are artificially inflated.
4. Old data. Item 19 should reference the most recent fiscal year. If the data is two or more years old, ask the franchisor why. Revenue from 2021 (a pandemic year) is not predictive of 2026 performance.
5. Vague geography. National averages can hide massive regional variation. A pizza franchise that averages $800K nationally might average $1.2M in suburbs and $400K in rural markets. If the brand doesn't break down data by region or market type, ask for it.

What it means when a brand doesn't disclose

A blank Item 19 is not automatically a deal-breaker, but it should raise your scrutiny level. Here is how to fill the gap:

• Talk to existing franchisees. Item 20 of the FDD lists every current and former franchisee with contact information. Call at least 10–15 owners and ask about revenue, expenses, and take-home pay. Cross-reference their answers for consistency.
• Check SBA loan performance. SBA data on FranchiseVerdict shows charge-off rates for franchise brands, which is a proxy for financial viability. A brand with a high SBA charge-off rate and no Item 19 disclosure is a double warning sign.
• Request an earnings claim waiver. Some franchise attorneys can negotiate for the franchisor to provide financial data under a confidentiality agreement, even if it isn't in the FDD. This is uncommon but worth asking about.
• Analyze Item 21 (financial statements). The franchisor's own audited financials in Item 21 can reveal trends in system-wide revenue, royalty income per unit, and overall financial health of the parent company.

How to use Item 19 in your decision

Item 19 should be one input in a broader due diligence process, not the sole basis for your investment decision. Even the best Item 19 disclosure represents historical data, not a guarantee of future performance. Here is a practical framework:

1. Start with the median revenue figure (or the bottom quartile if available). This is the scenario you should model as your base case.
2. Build an expense model using cost of goods sold, labor, rent, royalties, ad fund contributions, insurance, and miscellaneous overhead. Many franchise categories have well-known expense ratios.
3. Stress-test the model by reducing revenue by 20%. If the business still covers your debt service and living expenses at 80% of the median, you have a reasonable margin of safety.
4. Cross-reference with franchisee calls. Do the numbers franchisees report match what Item 19 suggests? If there is a wide gap, dig into why.
5. Compare across brands in the same category using our comparison tool to see how different franchises perform on the same metrics.

The franchise brands that consistently perform well — low failure rates, strong unit economics, transparent disclosure — tend to be the ones that include a detailed Item 19 because they have good news to share.

Related franchise research

Continue your research with our franchise owner salary guide, franchise failure rate analysis, and is a franchise worth it.