Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Z!Eats Full-Service Restaurants Remove | 101 Chicken Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $498K – $713K | $397K – $809K |
Liquid capital | $15K – $35K | $20K – $30K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $30K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 4.0% |
Ad fund rate | 3.0% | 0.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $577K | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | FBottom Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 88 / 100 | 57 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 36 | 4 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 95 | 143 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 32 | 4 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Z!Eats vs 101 Chicken editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →