Compare
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Tapville Social Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Dave’s Hot Chicken Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $101K – $2.5M | $620K – $2.0M |
Liquid capital | $3K – $100K | $16K – $48K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 4.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $385K | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | DBelow Average |
Risk score | 34 / 100 | 77 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 8 | 10 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 36 | 169 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 2.8% | 0.6% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 155 | 66 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 36 | 62 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Tapville Social vs Dave’s Hot Chicken editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →