Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | stayfull Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Yi Fang Taiwan Fruit Tea Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $122K – $226K | $119K – $221K |
Liquid capital | $33K – $121K | $30K – $40K |
Franchise fee | $25K | $30K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 4.0% |
Ad fund rate | 10.0% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | FBottom Quintile |
Risk score | 65 / 100 | 97 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 2 | 33 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 48.5% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 3 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 3 |
Initial training (hrs) | 72 | 160 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 4 | 47 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the stayfull vs Yi Fang Taiwan Fruit Tea editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →