Compare
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Owl Be There Senior Care Remove | Right at Home Senior Care Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $113K – $137K | $89K – $161K |
Liquid capital | $22K – $38K | $17K – $40K |
Franchise fee | $60K | $50K |
Royalty rate | N/A | N/A |
Ad fund rate | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $130K | $1.6M |
Median gross sales | $127K | $1.2M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 35 / 100 | 9 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 3.4% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 158 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 7 | 531 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 42.9% | 1.7% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 30 | 86 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 19 | 349 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Owl Be There vs Right at Home editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →