Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Owl Be There logo

Owl Be There Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareVAFranchising since 2020
BAbove averageAbove average58/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$113K – $137K
Disclosed sales
$130K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01856FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Owl Be There is a senior services franchise providing senior-living placement and referral services to families. Franchisees run home-based operations, matching seniors with care communities for referral fees.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Owl Be There franchise requires a total initial investment of $113K – $137K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $130K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2025 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - a newer filing may exist

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$113K – $137K
63rd pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
$130K
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty
6.5%
76th pct Senior Care
Units
7
27th pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$113K – $137K
Median $137K
near median
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$22K – $38K
Median $38K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$130K
Median $1.1M
Per franchisee, not per outlet
Royalty Rate
6.5%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
6.5% of rev
Median 7.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
7 units
Median 25 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
42.9%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $113K – $137K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $130K/year (median $127K). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 58/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (4 opened, 3 closed); 2 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG3 units terminated last reporting year (42.9% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Owl Be There Franchising, LLC
Parent company
OBT Corporation
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
David Greenwood
Incorporated in
VA
HQ
6200 Rolling Road, #2400, Springfield, Virginia 22152
Auditor
DA Advisory Group PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$494K
vs $205K prior year

Affiliated brands

  • Custom Senior Living Search
  • Owl Be There Intellectual Property

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
David Greenwood
Headquarters
VA
Founded
2020
FDD year
2025
States available
5

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 8% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$113K – $137KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,900Verified — printed on page 10 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.5%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$22K – $38K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown13 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$60K$60K
Onboarding and Training Feenot refundable$15K$15K
Travel & Expenses During Training$2K$4K
Start-Up Kit Feenot refundable$5K$5K
CSA Certification$990$990
NPRA Membership$399$399
Computer System$0$3K
General Supplies$200$400
Insurance$2K$3K
Professional Fees, Business Licenses, Legal Fees$850$3K
Professional Development / Business Coaching$6K$6K
Rent and Utilities——
Additional Funds - 3 Months$22K$38K
Total initial investment$113K$137K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$113K – $137K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$22K – $38K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
6.5%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
$250 per month (National Brand Fund flat fee, not to exce…
Total fee load
6.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Owl Be There: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.5% of gross sales
Technology fee$800
Training fee$15K
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$8K
Total fee load6.5% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 6.5% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 88% below the senior care norm.

Avg gross sales$130K

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$127KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size3 franchisees

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Owl Be There until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$155K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Owl Be There unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $129,917 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $113K–$137K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $22K–$38K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$155K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Avg gross sales
$130K
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$127K
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
3 franchisees
vs category median 22 · small
Range (low → high)
$110K→$153KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
The FDD edition these figures were read from
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank63th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank76th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank27th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank49th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 127 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $130K/year in gross sales.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.5% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence. Sample size of 3 franchisees — treat as directional only.

Operator retention

Net unit growth of +50.0% over 3 years (4 opened, 3 closed).

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Owl Be There Compares

Metric
Owl Be There
Category median
vs median
Investment
$125K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Near median
Revenue
$130K
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
7
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units7Verified — printed on page 43 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+50.0% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate42.9% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
7
Opened
4
Last reporting year
Closed
3
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
42.9%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
86%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+50.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+50.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Signed, not yet open
2
0.29 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
6
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
0.1%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
4
Franchised units
2023
5+1
Franchised units
2024
6+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 5 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

5

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score58/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average58Verdict score 58/100

Early-stage franchisor with undisclosed profitability metrics, minimal unit count, high cost structure relative to reported revenues, and insufficient franchisee financial performance data to validate investment viability.

Low confidence±15 pts
4373

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

0 case reference(s): 0 pending, 0 settled.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · DA Advisory Group PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.5MYr 2: $0.2MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 58 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDNet Income not disclosed in FDD Item 19 — cannot validate profitability claims or ROI timeline
  2. 02MEDOnly 7 units system-wide indicates early-stage franchise with limited proven model and scalability
  3. 03MINORHigh royalty structure (6.5-10% + minimum monthly fee) creates dual burden; minimum fee amount not specified
  4. 04MINOR20% YoY growth from minimal base (7 units) is mathematically modest and sustainability is unproven
  5. 05MINOR10-year term is lengthy commitment for unproven brand with no franchisee track record data available

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 127 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training132 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population700,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ75 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationSpringfield, Virginia
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawVA
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

0 case reference(s): 0 pending, 0 settled.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
132 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Northern VA, OBT Training Center (pre-opening in-person); post-opening via Zoom/teleconference or in-person
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

18 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 18 contacts · $49
Free preview
(813) 733-••••
Unlock all 18 contacts
(302) 295-••••
(985) 338-••••
(480) 805-••••
(703) 559-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Owl Be There franchise?

The total investment to open a Owl Be There franchise ranges from $113K – $137K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Owl Be There franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Owl Be There FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $130K. The median is $127K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Owl Be There?

Owl Be There is franchised by Owl Be There Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is OBT Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Owl Be There FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Owl Be There FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Owl Be There's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Owl Be There (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Owl Be There franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Owl Be There has 7 total units in the United States, including 6 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 4 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Owl Be There a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Owl Be There as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 58 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Owl Be There, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.