Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Lumberjacks logoCAverage
Lumberjacks
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
grown logoCAverage
grown
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$596K – $1.5M
$462K – $1.7M
Liquid capital
$40K – $100K
$35K – $125K
Franchise fee
$40K
$50K
Royalty rate
4.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
0.5%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
N/A
$1.8MCompany-owned only1 outlet
Median gross sales
N/A
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
$165K
Earnings metric
Not classified
Gross Sales Less Disclosed Expenses12
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
46 / 100
40 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
0.0%
N/A
SBA loans on record
2
N/A
Scale
Total units
8
1
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
14.3%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
200
62
Contacts
Franchisee phones
7
0

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Lumberjacks vs grown editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →