Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | GLO Tanning Personal Care & Beauty Remove | SUN TAN CITY Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $757K – $1.5M | $1.0M – $1.8M |
Liquid capital | $41K – $85K | $50K – $100K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $30K |
Royalty rate | 6.5% | 8.0% |
Ad fund rate | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $749K | $627K |
Median gross sales | $970K | $587K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $574K | N/A |
Earnings metric | P&L Bottom Line | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 38 / 100 | 44 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 42 | 3 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 82 | 252 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 65 | 180 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 100 | 158 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the GLO Tanning vs SUN TAN CITY editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →