FranchiseVerdict
SUN TAN CITY logo
FV-02492·MODERATEExcellent81

Sun Tan City

Formerly known as The Screen Tile Company

Personal Services - Beauty & SalonFranchising since 2007Website
Investment
$1.0M – $1.8M
96th pct Beauty & Salon
Avg revenue
$627K
43rd pct Beauty & Salon
Royalty
8.0%
68th pct Beauty & Salon
Units
252
82nd pct Beauty & Salon
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $1.0M – $1.8M including a $30K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $627K/year (median $587K).
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 57/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 2 loans (below the industry average).
  • System contracting at -5.5% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
STC Franchising, LLC
Parent company
STC Consolidated Operations, LLC
Incorporated in
Kentucky
HQ
101 Catalog Drive, Elizabethtown, Kentucky 42701
Auditor
Mather & Co. CPAs, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$6.6M
vs $6.4M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one SUN TAN CITY unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $627,114
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $1.0M–$1.8M
Working capital
$
FDD reports $50K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

8%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$125K
EBITDA margin
20.0%
Total invested
$1.5M
Payback
143 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 SUN TAN CITY units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

49.9%

7.57× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

1.88×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$1.6M

on $8.2M purchase

Total debt

$6.5M

SBA $4.1M + senior + seller note

Overview

About

Franchisees operate indoor tanning salons offering UV bed sessions, spray tanning services, and retail lotion/skincare products. Day-to-day operations include managing staff, maintaining tanning equipment, customer scheduling, cleanliness/sanitation compliance, and driving local marketing to attract and retain tanning customers.

CEO
Richard D. Kueber, Jr.
Founded
2007
FDD year
2026
States available
18

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$1.0M – $1.8M
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$50K – $100K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$30K
Royalty
8.0%
8% of Gross Revenue · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$627K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$587K
Item 19 type
Average and Median operating results (Total Revenues and Sessions)
Sample size
162 units
vs category median 34 · large
Range (low → high)
$200K$1.5M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank43th
vs Personal Services - Beauty & Salon peers
Investment cost rank96th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank68th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank82th
vs Personal Services - Beauty & Salon peers
Risk score rank35th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
252
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
3
Turnover rate
1.2%
Company-owned
96
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
62%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
-3.7%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
-5.5%
Compounded over last 3 years
2024
156-1
Franchised units
2025
162
Franchised units
2026
165
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 13 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 13 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

57
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE57 / 100

Sun Tan City presents HIGH RISK due to a shrinking franchise system, undisclosed profitability metrics, questionable franchisor going concern status, and structural headwinds in a declining tanning industry.

Score breakdown · what drove the 57 / 100 rating

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-3.7% YoY) indicates system contraction and potential market saturation in tanning industry
  2. 02MEDNo Item 19 financial disclosure (Net Income not disclosed) prevents validation of actual profitability claims
  3. 03HIGHGoing Concern status FALSE suggests potential franchisor financial instability or operational concerns
  4. 04MINORHigh initial investment ($1.0M-$1.8M) paired with declining unit economics creates significant franchisee risk
  5. 05MINORUnprotected territory exposes franchisees to internal competition and cannibalization from new units
  6. 06MINORAging business model: indoor tanning faces secular headwinds from UV health concerns and changing consumer preferences
  7. 07MED8% royalty on $627K average revenue ($50K+ annual fee) leaves limited margin for net profit with undisclosed expenses

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
radius
Protected territory
No
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Granted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Kentucky

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
0 hrs
On-the-job training
180 hrs
POS system
approved point of sale ('POS') software
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

99 numbers

Locked
(913) 400-••••
KS
(603) 740-••••
NH
(318) 687-••••
LA

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

SUN TAN CITY · FDD (2026) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above