Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Crooked Pint Ale House Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Wings Etc. Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $1.2M – $2.1M | $369K – $2.9M |
Liquid capital | $50K – $75K | $45K – $500K |
Franchise fee | $55K | $25K |
Royalty rate | 4.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $170K | $1.6M |
Median gross sales | $186K | $1.5M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | $220K |
Earnings metric | Not classified | P&L Bottom Line |
| Risk | ||
Rating | FBottom Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 100 / 100 | 29 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 12.2% |
SBA loans on record | 1 | 53 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 14 | 80 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 7.1% | 1.3% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 20 | 11 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 475 | 316 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 13 | 61 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Crooked Pint Ale House vs Wings Etc. editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →