Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (Owner's Discretionary, Average Gross Profit). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Clothes Bin logoAStrongest tier
Clothes Bin
Health & Fitness
 Remove
AStrongest tier
STRETCHMED
Health & Fitness
 Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$162K – $217K
$118K – $253K
Liquid capital
$20K – $40K
$10K – $20K
Franchise fee
$50K
$50K
Royalty rate
N/A
6.0%
Ad fund rate
N/A
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$359KOutlet subset
$519KOutlet subset
Median gross sales
$242KOutlet subset
$546KOutlet subset
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
$110K
Earnings metric
Owner's Discretionary
Average Gross Profit
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
89 / 100
74 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
16.7%
0.0%
SBA loans on record
20
12
Scale
Total units
74
31
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
8.6%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
5
10
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
8
152
Contacts
Franchisee phones
63
32

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Clothes Bin vs STRETCHMED editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →