Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Angry Chickz Full-Service Restaurants Remove | ProSource Wholesale Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $603K – $1.3M | $956K – $979K |
Liquid capital | $20K – $55K | $116K – $116K |
Franchise fee | $50K | $46K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 3.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $2.1M | $6.1M |
Median gross sales | $2.1M | $4.8M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 44 / 100 | 20 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 8 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 28 | 151 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 150 | 174 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 4 | 100 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Angry Chickz vs ProSource Wholesale editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →