Tapville Social vs Schlotzsky’s
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Tapville Social and Schlotzsky’s are full-service restaurants franchises. Tapville Social requires an investment of $101K – $2.5M while Schlotzsky’s requires $648K – $2.0M. In terms of revenue, Schlotzsky’s reports higher average unit revenue at $1.1M. Schlotzsky’s has SBA lending data on file with a 20.6% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Tapville Social A (Top Quintile) and Schlotzsky’s B (Above Average).
| Metric | Tapville Social | Schlotzsky’s |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | ATop QuintileTop Quintile | BAbove AverageAbove Average |
| Investment Range | $101K – $2.5M | $648K – $2.0M |
| Franchise Fee | $45K | $36K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $385K | $1.1M |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | 20.6% (533 loans) |
| Total Units | 36 | 308 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2019 | 2017 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$101K – $2.5M
$648K – $2.0M
Franchise Fee
$45K
$36K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$385K
$1.1M
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
20.6% (533 loans)
Total Units
36
308
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2019
2017
FDD Year
2025
2025