Buffalo Wild Wings vs Tim Ho Wan
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Buffalo Wild Wings and Tim Ho Wan are full-service restaurants franchises. Buffalo Wild Wings requires an investment of $2.5M – $4.9M while Tim Ho Wan requires $3.2M – $3.8M. Buffalo Wild Wings discloses average revenue of $3.6M; Tim Ho Wan does not report Item 19 data. Buffalo Wild Wings has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Buffalo Wild Wings A (Strongest tier) and Tim Ho Wan B (Above average).
| Metric | Buffalo Wild Wings | Tim Ho Wan |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tierStrongest tier | BAbove averageAbove average |
| Investment Range | $2.5M – $4.9M | $3.2M – $3.8M |
| Franchise Fee | $13K | $86K |
| Royalty Rate | 5% of Gross Sales for first half of Franchise Agreement term; for second half, greater of 5% or the then-current royalty rate under franchisor's latest FA form, but franchisor may not increase by more than 0.5% during the term | 3.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $3.6M | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (22 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 1,178 | 6 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 1991 | 2020 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$2.5M – $4.9M
$3.2M – $3.8M
Franchise Fee
$13K
$86K
Royalty Rate
5% of Gross Sales for first half of Franchise Agreement term; for second half, greater of 5% or the then-current royalty rate under franchisor's latest FA form, but franchisor may not increase by more than 0.5% during the term
3.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$3.6M
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (22 loans)
N/A
Total Units
1,178
6
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
1991
2020
FDD Year
2026
2025