Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

Wing It On! litigation history

What Wing It On! disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 & 4 at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
1
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest disclosed settlement
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Disclosed
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

BC Licensing, LLC v. DMD Chicken, LLC et al. - BC Licensing filed suit against former franchisee DMD Chicken and its co-founders for breach of contract and breach of personal guarantees. Defendants filed counterclaim against franchisor entities (BCIP, LLC, JRS Hospitality LLC) and officers (Joshua Halpern, Perry Rogers, Shaquille O'Neal, Corey Jenkins, Matthew Silverman, Samuel Stanovich) alleging fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and Nevada deceptive trade practices violations. Case pending as of April 30, 2025.

Disclosed in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 4: bankruptcy

In re Roti Restaurants, LLC - Chapter 11 reorganization filed August 23, 2024 in Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 24-13827). Roti operated fast-casual restaurant chain; business failed due to rising costs, mixed location performance, and difficult market conditions. Plan confirmation order issued February 26, 2025.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Recent affiliate bankruptcy (Roti Restaurants, Chapter 11, Aug 2024, plan confirmed Feb 2025)
  • Officer named in ongoing litigation counterclaim

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?