FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing
TRYP by Wyndham litigation history
What TRYP by Wyndham disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 14
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- $775K
- As stated in Item 3
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- None
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2026
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
Three pending class action lawsuits filed against Wyndham Hotels & Resorts affiliates in Canada: (1) Benoit v. IDeaS et al. (Quebec) - filed January 2026, alleging price fixing and unfair competition in hotel revenue management; (2) Jantunen v. IDeaS et al. (British Columbia) - filed December 2025, alleging similar price fixing conspiracy; (3) Proulx et al. v. Orsini Bros. Inns et al. (Ontario) - filed July 2025, alleging misleading resort/tourism fees. No litigation against Franchisor itself. All pending cases involve parent company Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and/or affiliate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Canada, Inc.
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- 14 litigation matters but none vs. franchisor itself; parent/affiliate class actions
- Minor: parent-level litigation exposure
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?