Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing

The Brothers that just do Gutters litigation history

What The Brothers that just do Gutters disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
5
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
$2K
As stated in Item 3
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2026
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Item 3 discloses: (1) a 2016 Virginia Securities Division Settlement Order against predecessor The Brothers Franchising, Corp. for an unregistered franchise sale ($2,500 penalty); and four matters involving affiliates - Executive Home Care Franchising v. Marshall Defendants (arbitration lost, $215,386 awarded against Executive Home Care); Executive Home Care v. Specialized Home Care Providers (settled, Defendants paid $55,000); CALLRN/Assisted Living Locators v. Vasia Corp/Mishkin/Clark (settled, $112,500 paid to franchisees); and CALLRN/ALL v. JL2 Holdings/Dickerson/Cohen (settled, $46,190 paid to franchisees).

Item 3 (litigation) · 5 matters disclosed

Litigation cases

The franchisor and its predecessor

Concluded (1)

  • Matter with no printed caption

    settled

    Government or regulatory action · The Brothers Franchising, Corp. · Commonwealth of Virginia, State Corporation Commission, Division of Securities and Retail Franchising · SEC-2015-00056

    “On January 6, 2016, our predecessor, The Brothers Franchising, Corp., entered into a Settlement Order with the Commonwealth of Virginia, State Corporation Commission, Division of Securities and Retail Franchising relating to an unregistered sale of a franchise territory in Virginia (case number SEC-2015-00056).”Page 15 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “The Settlement Order: (a) required The Brothers Franchising, Corp. to pay a $2,000 penalty plus $500 for the cost of the investigation; and (b) prohibited The Brothers Franchising, Corp. and its successors from violating Virginia’s Retail Franchising Act in the future.”

Parent, affiliates, master franchisor and subfranchisor

Concluded (4)

  • CALLRN Franchise, LLC d/b/a Assisted Living Locators v. Vasia Corporation, Aaron Mishkin and Valerie Clark

    settled

    Brought by the franchisor · CALLRN Franchise, LLC (Assisted Living Locators) · filed 2022-03-03 · American Arbitration Association · 01-22-0000-9785

    “… Case No. 01-22-0000-9785 On March 3, 2022, our affiliate, CALLRN Franchise, LLC d/b/a Assisted Living Locators (“ALL”), filed a demand for arbitration”Page 16 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “... agreement under which the parties agreed, without any other exchange of consideration, to repurchase Respondents’ four Assisted Living Locators franchise territories for $28,125 each, for a total payment of $112,500.00, in exchange for the reconveyance of the territories, mutual Brothers Gutters Multi-State FDD April 24, 2026 10 releases and dismissals of all claims and counterclaims asserted in the arbitration ...”

  • CALLRN Franchise LLC and Assisted Living Locators Licensing, LLC v. JL2 Holdings, Inc., Lara Dickerson, Assisted Living Michelle Cohen, LLC and Michelle Cohen

    settled

    Brought by the franchisor · CALLRN Franchise, LLC (Assisted Living Locators) · filed 2020-06-03 · United States District Court for the District of Arizona · 2:20-cv-01091-MTL

    “… Case No. 2:20-cv-01091-MTL On June 3, 2020, our affiliate, CALLRN Franchise, LLC d/b/a Assisted”Page 17 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3
  • Executive Home Care Franchising, LLC v. Marshall Health Corp., Well-Being Home Corp., Clint Marshall, Massare Marshall and Greer Marshall

    judgment

    Brought by the franchisor · Executive Home Care Franchising, LLC · filed 2015-02-03 · U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey; American Arbitration Association (01-15-0003-2409) · 15-ch-00760

    “… U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey;”Page 15 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3
  • Executive Home Care Franchising, LLC v. Specialized Home Care Providers, LLC, Michael Creatore and Nicholas Kerpsack

    settled

    Brought by the franchisor · Executive Home Care Franchising, LLC · filed 2015-02-27 · U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey; American Arbitration Association (01-15-0003-4773) · 15-ch-01486

    “… U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey;”Page 15 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Four litigation matters (mostly affiliate/predecessor)

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?