Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing

Embassy Suites by Hilton litigation history

What Embassy Suites by Hilton disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 & 4 at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
15
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest disclosed settlement
$2.1M
As stated in Item 3
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2026
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

5 pending actions (1 vs franchisor breach of contract, 4 class action antitrust); 5 concluded actions involving franchisor (breach of contract, consumer protection/fee disclosure settlements with TX $2.1M and NE $300K, franchise disputes); 4 collection suits against former franchisees; 1 historical 1971 Sherman Act consent decree involving predecessor HHC

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Multiple active antitrust lawsuits and recent AG settlements indicate systemic compliance issues with pricing transparency and guest fee disclosures
  • Litigation pattern shows breach of contract and termination disputes with franchisees, suggesting contentious franchisor-franchisee relationships
  • 23-year term is lengthy given declining unit trajectory and litigation exposure; exit options may be limited

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?