Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Wok to Walk Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Kilwins Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $346K – $824K | $295K – $880K |
Liquid capital | $11K – $20K | $8K – $75K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 0.5% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $933K |
Median gross sales | N/A | $802K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 47 / 100 | 48 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 3.6% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 120 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 6 | 172 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 3.5% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | N/A | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 264 | 200 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 0 | 21 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Wok to Walk vs Kilwins editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →