Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Skrimp Shack Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Turquoise Wine Bar Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $286K – $614K | $305K – $601K |
Liquid capital | $10K – $15K | $40K – $60K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $40K |
Royalty rate | N/A | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $796K | N/A |
Median gross sales | $794K | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Net Profit |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 48 / 100 | 37 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 16.7% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 7 | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 32 | 1 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 365 | 60 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 29 | 16 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Skrimp Shack vs Turquoise Wine Bar editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →