Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Rush Bowls Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Samurai Sam’s Teriyaki Grill Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $196K – $548K | $113K – $623K |
Liquid capital | $15K – $25K | $5K – $20K |
Franchise fee | $39K | $30K |
Royalty rate | N/A | N/A |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 4.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $454K |
Median gross sales | N/A | $423K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 51 / 100 | 40 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 100.0% |
SBA loans on record | 38 | 1 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 53 | 12 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 20.8% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 92 | 80 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 4 | 6 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Rush Bowls vs Samurai Sam’s Teriyaki Grill editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →