Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
These brands report different earnings metrics (P&L Bottom Line, EBITDA). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.
| Brand | Palm Beach Beauty & Tan Personal Care & Beauty Remove | Hammer & Nails Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $648K – $1.1M | $694K – $944K |
Liquid capital | $60K – $60K | $50K – $75K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $60K |
Royalty rate | N/A | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $497K | $929K |
Median gross sales | $468K | $862K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $121K | $123K |
Earnings metric | P&L Bottom Line | EBITDA |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | DBelow Average |
Risk score | 62 / 100 | 77 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 4.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 50 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 650 | 59 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 397 | 86 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 100 | 72 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Palm Beach Beauty & Tan vs Hammer & Nails editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →