Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | MARUFUKU RAMEN Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Schlotzsky’s Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $1.1M – $1.6M | $648K – $2.0M |
Liquid capital | $30K – $40K | $39K – $71K |
Franchise fee | $50K | $36K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 4.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $3.0M | $1.1M |
Median gross sales | $2.9M | $1.1M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 39 / 100 | 56 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 20.6% |
SBA loans on record | 1 | 533 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 9 | 308 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 4.2% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 20 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 20 |
Initial training (hrs) | 520 | 250 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 10 | 94 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the MARUFUKU RAMEN vs Schlotzsky’s editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →