Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Mad for Chicken Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Teriyaki Madness Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $437K – $917K | $376K – $976K |
Liquid capital | $60K – $205K | $10K – $30K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $45K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 3.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $2.5M | $1.2M |
Median gross sales | N/A | $1.1M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | $86K |
Earnings metric | Not classified | P&L Bottom Line |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 33 / 100 | 44 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 7.1% |
SBA loans on record | 1 | 127 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 9 | 158 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 10.1% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 178 | 293 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 18 | 208 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Mad for Chicken vs Teriyaki Madness editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →