Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Great Harvest Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Coffee and Water Lab Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $298K – $980K | $441K – $838K |
Liquid capital | $26K – $48K | $60K – $100K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 4.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $948K | $1.4M |
Median gross sales | $823K | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 43 / 100 | 37 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 13.4% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 199 | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 159 | 1 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | N/A |
Initial training (hrs) | 293 | 55 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 100 | 14 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Great Harvest vs Coffee and Water Lab editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →