Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | GLO Tanning Personal Care & Beauty Remove | HairClub Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $757K – $1.5M | $492K – $1.5M |
Liquid capital | $41K – $85K | $100K – $350K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $38K |
Royalty rate | 6.5% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 3.0% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $749K | $2.1M |
Median gross sales | $970K | $1.9M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $574K | N/A |
Earnings metric | P&L Bottom Line | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 38 / 100 | 56 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 42 | 1 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 82 | 104 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 65 | 472 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 100 | 21 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the GLO Tanning vs HairClub editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →