Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Binghamton HOTS Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Combo Brands Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $142K – $253K | $49K – $353K |
Liquid capital | $20K – $35K | $2K – $35K |
Franchise fee | $25K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 7.0% |
Ad fund rate | 0.5% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $702K | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 39 / 100 | 47 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 1 | 13 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 7 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 7 |
Initial training (hrs) | 56 | 48 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 10 | 19 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Binghamton HOTS vs Combo Brands editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →