The Bar Method vs OsteoStrong
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both The Bar Method and OsteoStrong are health & fitness franchises. The Bar Method requires an investment of $356K – $513K while OsteoStrong requires $276K – $616K. The Bar Method discloses average revenue of $383K; OsteoStrong does not report Item 19 data. On SBA loan performance, OsteoStrong has a lower charge-off rate (3.6%) compared to The Bar Method (13.7%). FranchiseVerdict rates The Bar Method B (Above Average) and OsteoStrong A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | The Bar Method | OsteoStrong |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove AverageAbove Average | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $356K – $513K | $276K – $616K |
| Franchise Fee | $43K | $35K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 7.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $383K | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 13.7% (51 loans) | 3.6% (55 loans) |
| Total Units | 74 | 153 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2021 | 2012 |
| FDD Year | 2024 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$356K – $513K
$276K – $616K
Franchise Fee
$43K
$35K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
7.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$383K
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
13.7% (51 loans)
3.6% (55 loans)
Total Units
74
153
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2021
2012
FDD Year
2024
2025